Abordaje del acceso vascular por equipo de terapia infusional: seguridad y calidad asistencial / Approach to vascular access by infusion therapy team: safety and quality of care

Objetivo: describir la evolución del modelo de atención del acceso vascular por un equipo de terapia infusional enfermero referente (ETI) y sus resultados en la seguridad vinculados al acceso vascular central de inserción periférica (PICC) en pacientes oncohematológicos. Métodos: estudio observacional en una cohorte retrospectiva de 3.423 pacientes oncohematológicos a los cuales se les indicó un PICC ambulatoriamente durante 2012-2021. Variables: modelo de atención, motivo de la indicación, método de comprobación de la colocación del acceso, complicaciones del acceso vascular. Recogida de información mediante datos primarios del registro de acceso vascular y registro clínico de la historia informatizada ESPOQ2©. Análisis descriptivo paquete estadístico IBM SPSS® V.23.0 . Resultados: la creación de un equipo referente de terapia infusional incrementó la capacidad de colocación de catéteres, pasando de 98 (2013) a 768 (2021). La indicación del PICC pasó del 45,80% por instauración de quimioterapia mediante bomba de infusión domiciliaria (2016) al 93,70% por indicación por fármaco irritante o vesicante (2021) (p< 0,001). La introducción de la técnica ecoguiada y método electro-intracavitario de control de punta disminuyeron las complicaciones por flebitis mecánicas y la radiación por comprobación de catéter (p< 0,001). Conclusiones: los modelos de atención con equipos de terapia infusional referentes consolidados incrementan la seguridad del paciente oncológico portador de acceso vascular PICC.(AU)

Objective: to describe the evolution of the vascular access care model led by a nurse infusion therapy (ETI) team and its safety results associated with peripherally inserted central vascular access (PICC) in oncohematology patients. Methods: descriptive observational study in a retrospective cohort in 3,423 oncohaematological patients who were indicated for a PICC on an outpatient basis during 2012 to 2021. Variables: Care model, reason for the indication, access placement verification method, vascular access complications. Data collection using primary data from the vascular access registry and clinical registry of the ESPOQ2© computerized history. Descriptive analysis using IBM® SPSS® Statistics V.23.0. Results: infusional teams' reference increased the capacity to place catheters, going from 98 (2013) to 768 (2021). The indication for the PICC went from 45.80% due to initiation of chemotherapy home infusion (2016) to 93.70% due to an indication for an irritant or vesicant drug (2021) (p< 0.001). The introduction of the ultrasound-guided technique and electro-intracavitary method of tip control decreased complications due to mechanical phlebitis and radiation due to catheter verification (p< 0.001). Conclusions: care models with consolidated reference infusion therapy teams increase the safety of cancer patients with PICC vascular access.(AU)

Participatory action research intervention for improving sleep in inpatients with cancer.

AIM: To design and implement a plan to improve oncohaematological patients' sleep. BACKGROUND: The hospital environment can compromise inpatients' sleep, negatively impacting on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. DESIGN AND METHOD: The improvement plan was designed in collaboration with 18 professionals, 3 patients and 3 accompanying relatives. The study designed followed the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Outcome variables were self-reported patient satisfaction regarding sleep, measured using a 30-item, ad hoc questionnaire and a 10-point visual analogue scale, completed by 318 oncohaematological inpatients (pre-intervention n = 120, post-intervention, n = 198) in a comprehensive cancer centre in Spain from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 61.5% (n = 190) of the inpatients reported sleep alterations, and 92.6% reported interruptions in their nightly sleep. Half slept less than 6 h/night, but 58.0% said they felt rested upon waking, despite the interruptions. These outcomes were similar before and after the intervention. The improvement plan identified four domains for work (professionals, care procedures, instruments/environment and patients/relatives), 10 areas for improvement and 35 actions for implementation. However, overall sleep worsened significantly, from 6.73 to 6.06 on the 10-point scale. The intervention significantly improved variables related to professionals' behaviour, including noise during the shift change, conversations at the control desk and the use of corridor lights. Sleep disturbances were mainly caused by pain/discomfort and infuser alarms, and collectively they decreased significantly after the intervention (p = .008). However, overall sleep worsened significantly, from 6.73 to 6.06 on the 10-point scale. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, clinical devices and noise made by professionals are the main causes of sleep disturbances. Involving professionals in decision-making to improve patients' sleep have a positive impact on noise levels. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study proposes new strategies for improving sleep by increasing staff awareness and changing attitudes towards patients' sleep. Nurses should be involved in addressing sleep disturbances during hospitalization.

Usefulness and Safety Evaluation of Chemotherapy Administration Device for Nurses: Experimental Study.

OBJECTIVE: Antineoplastic drugs are considered high risk, and computerized systems favor safe administration. The objective of the study was to test the usefulness and safety of a new mobile device compared to the standard device for administering these antineoplastic treatments. DATA SOURCES: This multicenter, quasi-experimental pre-post study assessed an intervention in two cancer centers in June and July 2020. Nineteen nurses participated by completing 57 questionnaires. The outcome variables were usefulness, ease of use, efficiency, safety, attitudes, and satisfaction with the new mobile device; they were measured by means of the USE questionnaire (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) and the Technology Attitude Survey (TAS). Professionals rated the new device higher than the standard device and showed a favorable attitude toward technology. CONCLUSION: The tested device was useful, effective, safe, and specific to the antineoplastic treatment administration process, garnering greater satisfaction among professionals than the standard. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: As new technologies can improve care for patients with cancer, it is essential to develop strategies to improve the experience of professionals for optimal implementation.

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD-Sp) in Hospitalized Patients with Neurologic Disorders and Oncologic Patients Unable to Self-Report Their Pain.

BACKGROUND: Pain has a significant impact on hospitalized patients and is a quality indicator for nursing care. The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale measures pain in people with communication disorders and advanced dementia, but it has not been validated in any other population. AIMS: The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version (PAINAD-Sp) in hospitalized patients with neurologic disorders and in end-of-life cancer patients with difficulty self-reporting. DESIGN: The study had two phases: (1) analysis of the content by a committee of experts and (2) a cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: We collected phase 2 data from January 2017 to December 2017 in four hospitals in Barcelona: Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, and Hospital de Bellvitge. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: We included all adults who had either a neurological disorder affecting language or an oncological disease with an end-of-life prognosis and difficulty self-reporting pain. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of dementia. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 325 patients who were simultaneously evaluated by two observers both at rest and in movement. We analyzed psychometric properties in terms of construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: We obtained Cronbach α > .70 in both situations and an inter-rater reliability of 0.80. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model adjusted adequately to a unidimensional structure. In terms of sensitivity to change, the mean difference was greater in movement than at rest (difference in means was 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: The PAINAD-Sp_Hosp scale had good psychometric qualities in terms of validity and reliability in neurology and oncology patients unable to self-report pain.